Archives

News

Brooklyn Bugle Book Club: “The City and the City” A Novel by China Miéville

August 8, 2014

A young woman murdered, her body dumped at the edge of a park in the poor part of town. It sounds like the start of a conventional murder mystery. From the beginning, though, there are hints that more is underway in this complex book. First are the names: they are almost but not entirely Arabic – the main character is a police detective, Tyador Borlú, his sidekick a woman named Lizbyet Corwi. Are we in Turkey? The city is the vaguely Slavic-sounding Besźel – but no such city exists. Perhaps we are in an imaginary city, one that, like Hav (see my review of “Hav” by Jan Morris here) hovers just off the maps in the eastern Mediterranean.

Confirmation comes soon enough. Tyador crosses a bridge, which he describes as “crowded, locally and elsewhere.” During a walk, Tyador sees a street that is quiet in Besźel, but crowded “with those elsewhere.” There are people, seen elsewhere, who must be unseen. Slowly, Besźel’s twin city, Ul Qoma, reveals itself. The cities are not twinned in the wayof Minneapolis and St. Paul. The twinning is instead superimposed, the development from two cultures that cleaved centuries ago yet share a space. The rift is mostly self-enforcing, except for a mysterious governing force, Breach. Residents of both cities live in dread of Breach, because once they have breached, or failed to ignore the difference in the cities, there are frightening and mysterious consequences.

The murdered woman was a graduate student from the US, working on an archeological dig in Ul Qoma, The murder appears to have taken place in Ul Qoma, though the body was dumped in Besźel. The victim was very interested in the political history of the two cities. What has she discovered? There is an intellectual tradition of a secret deeper than the mysterious Breach, a place or people called Orciny, that the victim once very publicly championed.

Tyador thinks it’s a perfect case for Breach to investigate, which doesn’t bother him as he is getting nowhere. Much to his surprise, Breach rejects the case, and Tyador goes through a complex bureaucratic process to cross to Ul Qoma where, in a new political spirit of cooperation, he must collaborate with his opposite number, an Ul Qoman detective named Dhatt.

Miéville compounds the mystery with the political overlay. The glasnost-like cooperation is bewildering to most inhabitants, who have learned since childhood to “unsee” their opposite numbers in what Miéville calls the “topolganger” city. He coins some additional words and uses a great deal of map imagery; shared areas are “cross-hatched,” while unshared areas are “total.” The occasional interference – a traffic accident – is a “protub,” and residents are adept at getting out of the way. It’s a collective fog (another image Miéville uses). But what happens when citizens can no longer look away? When a person is not in either city? When a policeman breaches? It’s a fascinating setup, one that repays close attention, and quite unlike most other mysteries. Miéville explores these questions while bringing the murder investigation and Borlú’s story to its satisfying conclusion. If mysteries are your thing at the beach, bring this one along.

See you in September! Have a book you want me to know about? Email me at asbowie@gmail.com. I also blog about metrics at asbowie.blogspot.com.

From the Web

Books

Brooklyn Bugle Book Club, “Moby-Dick” by Herman Melville

August 1, 2014

Image via theworldsgreatestbook.com

Call me benighted. Not in my secondary schooling, at a New England prep school that had recently gone co-ed, or in college, nor in any of the several years that have passed since I graduated, did I ever read, or even try to read “Moby-Dick.” True, in the bitter cold and long dark New England nights we did read “Billy Budd,” and that annoying story, whose bombastic lesson is only underlined by Benjamin Britten’s opera, made me decide never to read “Moby-Dick.”

That was a mistake. “Moby-Dick” is a terrific and engaging story; most notably, it’s surprisingly funny. It’s also fiercely dramatic. In case you don’t know, here’s a synopsis: Captain Ahab outfits a whaler in Nantucket to go in search of Moby-Dick, the great white whale who has defeated every attempt to kill him (and caused Ahab to lose a leg). Ishmael signs on as a crew member, and narrates the story of the voyage south from Nantucket, around Cape Horn, and into the Pacific Ocean in search of whales. Along the way there are diversions into types of whales, the histories of the various crew members, life on board ship, and storms and adventures.

Though there are spots of ennui, there is some pretty exciting writing. Here’s an example:

A short rushing sound leaped out of the boat; it was the darted iron of Queequeg. Then all in one welded commotion came an invisible push from astern, while forward the boat seemed striking on a ledge; the sail collapsed and exploded; a gush of scalding vapor shot up near by; something rolled and tumbled like an earthquake beneath us. The whole crew were half suffocated as they were tossed helter-skelter into the white curdling cream of the squall. Squall, whale, and harpoon had all blended together; and the whale, merely grazed by the iron, escaped.

You are there, in that small boat, chasing a whale with a storm coming up.

Despite the distance in time and space, the book has all sorts of resonance for the 21st century reader. It helps, perhaps, to have visited the New Bedford Whaling Museum, which has displays of whale boats and ledgers full of signatures and marks the whalemen made as they signed on as crew. The Seamen’s Bethel helps you picture the Whaleman’s Chapel Melville describes in Chapter 7. Nantucket and its harbor have probably changed since Melville’s time, but then Melville didn’t get there until after he’d written “Moby-Dick.” The reader who has been on a whale watch will also recognize many behaviors Melville describes, spouting of course, breaching, pectoral slaps and bubble feeding.

So yes, it’s a classic, it’s part of the canon. Let all that go (though Internet access helps because there are a lot of allusions, references, and descriptions of things most of us don’t come across every day) and enjoy yourself. Let us know your thoughts in the comments.

Have a book you want me to know about? Email me at asbowie@gmail.com. I also blog about metrics at asbowie.blogspot.com.

From the Web

Books

Brooklyn Bugle Book Club: “Amy Falls Down” A Novel by Jincy Willett

July 25, 2014

Some years ago, Michael Kinsley explored the notion of a political gaffe, an event, he said, when “a politician tells the truth — or more precisely, when he or she accidentally reveals something truthful about what is going on in his or her head.” Amy, the title character of Jincy Willett’s deeply comic novel “Amy Falls Down,” is a writer. She’s retired, except for some teaching, and retiring – her favorite companion is her bloodhound, Alphonse. Alphonse has “an uncanny fascination with where she planned to be and a genius for thwarting her: ordinarily a sedate plodder, he could materialize in a chair just as she was about to sit down.” If that’s a lot of attention for the dog, it’s attention that’s due, for Alphonse sets the plot in motion: he upends Amy as she is carrying a Norfolk pine out to her garden. Concussed, Amy sits for a rare interview, and, though she doesn’t remember what happens, says what she really thinks about writers and writing. Interview done, and a restless night later, Amy takes herself to the emergency room. That’s where she discovers, mostly to her chagrin but with a tiny bit of pleasure, that the interview has turned her into a literary celebrity.

Amy is old enough to resist the allure, but she finds herself carried along for the ride all the same. Her former literary agent turns up again, and arranges a series of radio appearances. They become TV appearances, and Amy, who hates to fly, criss-crosses the country by train. We revisit Amy’s past with her, her deep relationship with her gay friend Max, who died years ago, and the brief but disastrous marriage that brought her from New England to Southern California. We are there as she picks up her regular life of seeing friends and meeting students from her writing classes. We watch as Amy heals. We see that either the fall or the consequences has shaken something loose, and Amy starts writing short stories.

The gap between the writer as public persona and the writer as person provides a rich field, and Willett mines it well. One of Amy’s students wants to turn her home into a writer’s colony, but for people outside the standard writing world. Amy persuades her to name it “Croatoan – the Missing Writers’ Colony.” Amy works by writing down possible story titles such as “A Riot of Tasteful Color” or “Blushing in the Dark.” Over and over, Willett brings us back to Amy’s life and, maybe, the roots of her short stories. Here’s an example:

Amy drifted into deep sleep, coming awake again only just before sunrise, in the middle of a sex dream involving her much younger self and Anthony Hopkins in footy pajamas. Not for the first, time, Amy blushed in the dark.

Even at her age, Amy grows, connecting with people directly and virtually, in the 21st century way. “Amy Falls Down” is light enough to read during a day at the beach, and meaningful enough to stick with you long after the sunburn has gone. Altogether, it’s a satisfying, funny, and memorable novel.

Do you agree? Let us know in the comments.

Have a book you want me to know about? Email me at asbowie@gmail.com. I also blog about metrics at asbowie.blogspot.com.

From the Web

Books

Brooklyn Bugle Book Club: “How to Live or A Life of Montaigne: In One Question and Twenty Attempts at an Answer” by Sarah Bakewell

July 18, 2014

Good writing sets off a conversation in the mind of the reader paying attention. Sometimes the conversation devolves into an argument, and other times the questions push the reader into researching, reading more, and perhaps writing. That’s what Michel de Montaigne, a French provincial official who lived from 1533 to 1592, did; he was also, famously, the inventor of the personal essay. As Bakewell puts it, someone had to come up with the idea of “writing about oneself to create a mirror in which other people recognize their own humanity,” resonant though it is today in this age of memoirs and personal blogs. Not only did he invent the genre, but Montaigne was good at it, so good that no less a person than Gustave Flaubert advised a friend:

Don’t read him as children do, for amusement, nor as the ambitious do, to be instructed. No, read him in order to live.

Bakewell reports this instruction in her preface. What follows is a discursive trip through the life and work, each chapter arranged around one of Montaigne’s themes – birth, illness, death, solitude, conviviality, the joys of remaining home, the joys of travel, and sex – to name just a few. Threaded throughout are a biography of Montaigne and a biography of the essays as they were enlarged and revised by Montaigne himself, and then interpreted and translated by succeeding generations of writers and readers.

Montaigne was born in Bordeaux, where he spent most of his life, both managing his family’s estate and, as a younger man, working elsewhere in the province. His education, as Bakewell describes it, was unique: Montaigne was sent to board with his wet-nurse, rather than her living with his family, so that he would understand their ways. Once Montaigne returned home around the age of seven, no one spoke to him in any language other than Latin. This drastic step required hiring a tutor who spoke very good Latin, and everyone in the household learning (or improving) enough Latin in order to communicate with a child. The treatment paid off: Montaigne spoke, wrote, and read very good Latin indeed. Bakewell suggests that Montaigne did not always get along so well with his wife, so perhaps there was a downside. Nevertheless, Montaigne was well-prepared for a life of the mind.

He retired at age 37, having had his fill of government and provincial work. Besides, Montaigne’s father had died, and he had an estate to run, friends to speak with, and children to raise (and bury). Montaigne began writing two years later. He wrote and rewrote the essays several times, adding new ideas, layering them with second, and often third and fourth thoughts as he continued reading, thinking, and living. He contradicted himself often, but didn’t really mind. Lots of readers, and writers, read, thought, and wrote about him. Bakewell says of Montaigne’s influence on Nietzsche, for example:

Montaigne apparently managed the trick of living as Nietzsche longed to do: without petty resentments or regrets, embracing everything that happened without the desire to change it. The essayist’s casual remark, ‘If I had to live over again, I would live as I have lived,’ embodied everything Nietzsche spent his life trying to attain.

Montaigne came by this acceptance of life’s vagaries both by hard experience – many of his children died before he did, and he lost a very dear friend at a very young age – but also from his study of Stoicism, Epicureanism, and Skepticism which, Bakewell says, “[l]ike everyone else, Montaigne mixed and matched . . . according to his needs.”

It’s a wonderful book, a terrific introduction to the Essays, and creates a conversation that will live on for many readers. The last word goes to Bakewell:

Over the centuries, this interpretation and reinterpretation creates a long chain connecting a writer to all future readers–who frequently read each other as well as the original. Virginia Woolf had a beautiful vision of generations interlinked in this way: of how “minds are threaded together–how any live mind is of the very same stuff as Plato’s & Euripides . . . It is this common mind that binds the whole world together; & all the word is mind.”

Which chapter spoke to you most? Do you remember? Let us know in the comments.

Have a book you want me to know about? Email me at asbowie@gmail.com. I also blog about metrics at asbowie.blogspot.com.

From the Web

download (1)
Books

Brooklyn Bugle Book Club: “Jacob’s Folly” A Novel by Rebecca Miller

June 27, 2014

Pity poor Jacob Cerf. A French Jew who was educated first to be a nobleman’s valet, and then an actor, he lived and died during the reign of Louis XV. And dead he remained until Rebecca Miller resurrected him in the present, where he returns to life in the form of . . . he has wings. Jacob spends a great deal of the book figuring out what he is, and was, what he can do, what he can’t, and what he can but shouldn’t. The objects of his attention are two: first is Leslie Senzatimore, husband, father, volunteer firefighter, and all around good guy who lives somewhere on Long Island.

Then there’s Masha, who when we meet her is hospitalized with pericarditis. Masha is the daughter of pious Orthodox Jews, but wants something more. Jacob recognizes a sense of longing in her – naturally, it’s one that he himself has felt. He sets out to help her realize it. From these improbable elements, Miller has fashioned a blend of historical fiction and modern cross-cultural misconceptions. The result is a delightful novel that is funny, thoughtful, and compelling.

One of Jacob’s new skills is the ability to read the minds and to influence desires and the character’s actions. In his own life, once he got out of the Jewish community, Jacob was mostly amoral – in fact the historical figure he brings to mind is Casanova, without the priestly education. (The fictional character he brings to mind is Gregor Samsa.) Jacob falls in love with beautiful Masha, and recognizes her desire to be an actress – something her culture would not allow. Leslie also falls in love with Masha, and Jacob determines that there must be some way to bring them together. He infiltrates their thoughts, pushing them to take actions they might not have thought to do on their own – or might they? The question of free will is never very far away from the action.

Like Jacob in his time, Masha and Leslie struggle with the expectations of their communities. Masha lies to her parents about acting classes, then takes the train by herself into Manhattan from her Far Rockaway home. She loses track of the time, and cannot get home in time for the Sabbath. Leslie’s wife, Deirdre, feels him drifting away. Masha leaves home at the urging of a disgraced Hollywood agent who sees her as his ticket back to influence. Like Jacob, she enjoys her new life but misses some of the strictness. She finds something of it in Leslie, who is upright without being at all starchy. It’s a nice inversion of Jacob’s own story, also threaded throughout.

Miller’s story illustrates the continuity of our humanness across time and culture and the way that communities go on, repeating the acts and mistakes of the past. “Jacob’s Folly” is an unlikely and very successful blending of historical fiction and a modern love story. It’s also very funny. Enjoy it on your summer travels.

I’ll be on mine for the next couple of weeks. See you in July.

From the Web

Events

Family Party at the Transit Museum July 10

June 23, 2014

The NY Transit Museum will be holding a family party “Underground Summer” on Thursday, July 10, starting at 6 pm. Make a time capsule, learn about New York City’s two World’s Fairs, and see the cars that your parents and grandparents rode to the fair! Refreshments. For all ages.

Price is $7 adults/$5 for children 2-17 and seniors (62+). Advance registration recommended – to register call (718) 694-1848.

The New York Transit Museum is located at the corner of Boerum Place and Schermerhorn Street in Brooklyn Heights.

From the Web

Events

NY Transit Museum: Nostalgia Ride to Coney Island

June 21, 2014

Want to ride in an old subway car? One with rattan seats, paddle ceiling fans, and period advertisements? Ride a 1930s-vintage subway car to Coney Island with the NY Transit Museum on July 12, leaving at 11 AM.

Cost is $50 for adults, $25 for children ($35 and $20 for museum members). More information and tickets here.

From the Web

Events

June 25 Art and Mass Transit at the Transit Museum

June 21, 2014

The New York Transit Museum’s PLATFORM: Creative Musings on Mass Transit returns on June 25 at 6:30 pm. In this crowd-sourced series artist/commuters perform or present their work. This installment includes storytelling, rhythm and dance, haiku, and a take on A Hard Day’s Night, all transit inspired.

Wednesday, June 25, 6:30 pm, $10 members/$5 members at the NY Transit Museum, Boerum Place and Schermerhorn Street. More information and tickets here.

From the Web

Books

Brooklyn Bugle Book Club: “Dark Aemilia: A Novel of Shakespeare’s Dark Lady” by Sally O’Reilly

June 20, 2014

I grant I never saw a goddess go,
My mistress when she walks treads on the ground.
And yet by heaven I think my love as rare,
As any she belied with false compare.

The mysteries surrounding the life of William Shakespeare are many, and perhaps none has spawned so many stories as the “Dark Lady” sonnets (127-154) in which Shakespeare describes a love affair. Who was the Dark Lady? Are the sonnets based on life, and if so, whose? One candidate for the role is Emilia Lanier, the daughter of a Jewish Italian musician Baptista Bassano, and wife of a court musician named Alphonse Lanier. Her life story is the basis for Sally O’Reilly’s novel “Dark Aemilia.”

The fictional Aemilia Bassano is the mistress of Henry Carey, Lord Hunsdon, Lord Chamberlain to Queen Elizabeth. She lives, therefore, at the center of court life, though more as an observer than participant. She’s dangerously exposed all the same, especially because she is beautiful and intelligent, and doesn’t always keep her mouth shut. She becomes acquainted with William Shakespeare by letter, as she objects to his characterization of women, and marriage in “The Taming of the Shrew” whose performance she has witnessed. Eventually they meet in person, fall in love, and carry out an affair. It’s very risky for Aemilia, for if she loses the protection of Lord Hunsdon she has no other way to make a living, despite her wish to write.

Lord Hunsdon marries Aemilia off to Alphonse Lanyer. It’s an unhappy marriage, but one that produces a son (though it’s not entirely certain Alphonse is the father). Left to fend for herself through plague, fire, and other calamities, Aemilia both writes and dabbles in alchemy (though for women it’s known by another name). The relationship with Will ebbs and flows; as the sonnet cycle relates, they have a bitter falling out as well as obsessive and frequent sex. Forced to fend for herself through much of her tribulations, Aemilia uses the strengths she has, including her quick wits and her beauty, to keep herself and her son alive.

Doing so requires that she investigate supernatural channels that some call witchcraft, and in fact she meets and communicates with three witches at a fair. This suggests a story to her, one she writes down and that is ‘borrowed’ as the basis for one of Shakespeare’s tragedies. Aemilia is more upset by the intellectual betrayal than she is worried about the chances of being perceived as a witch.

Aemilia’s risk taking, the very strong female characters, and a persuasive portrayal of life in the sixteenth century go far to offset the novel’s weak plot, which depends too much on coincidence and supernatural beings. O’Reilly’s suggestion that Aemilia wrote or suggested MacBeth is interesting but ultimately unpersuasive. “Dark Aemilia” is a book to save for the beach.

Have a book you want me to know about? Email me at asbowie@gmail.com. I also blog about metrics at asbowie.blogspot.com.

From the Web

Books

Brooklyn Bugle Book Club: “Boy, Snow, Bird” a novel by Helen Oyeyemi

June 13, 2014

Race and sex should be easy categories to check off, immutable characteristics that everyone understands. But in fact even those categories turn out to be more fluid than we had understood (see, for example, Jan Morris’ terrific memoir “Conundrum” about her sex change, reviewed here.) The three main characters of Helen Oyeyemi’s engaging new novel “Boy, Snow, Bird” are a girl named Boy, a girl named Snow, and a girl named Bird. It’s a central strength of the novel that each is more than she appears, and that together they teach us something new about the classifications that half a century of law and usage have made of our natures.

In the early 1950s, Boy Novak, who is about 18, runs away from her home after her father, a rat catcher, abuses and humiliates her one time too many. Her mother died long ago, and she is leaving behind only her friend Charlie, who might or might not love her. She fetches up in a small town in central Massachusetts, where she lives in a boarding house and makes enough money doing odd jobs to survive – and even pay back the money she stole from her father. She becomes friends with two of the other young women in the boarding house, particularly Mia, a journalist. Through them she meets Arturo Whitman, the widowed father of Snow. He’s a history teacher turned jewelry-maker, and he gives Boy a gift of a bracelet: a gold snake that winds up her arm.

Appearances here are deceiving. The first hint comes when Boy meets Arturo’s mother, sister and daughter. Snow’s other grandmother, Agnes Miller, is also there. The room is dark, and there are areas of conversation that are clearly but silently declared out of bounds. The second hint comes when Arturo’s other sister, Clara, sends a gift to celebrate Arturo’s wedding to Boy. The gift is the first time Boy learns of Clara’s existence. Clara and her mother don’t get along, Arturo tells Boy. But it’s not because of anything that Clara has done, really. It’s because of who Clara is.

The language of Arturo’s Massachusetts family carried a few tones of the south. At first the reader winces at the anachronisms, but this book is carefully crafted, and the language is another clue. When Boy and Arturo have a daughter, Bird, who is born “with a suntan,” the secret is out. The Whitmans and the Millers are emigres from Mississippi. They are also passing as white – during the move north they decided to uncheck the race box. Hence the dark rooms and conversational shutdowns. Clara’s fault, if it is one, is that she has been born with dark skin. Keeping the secret in the nineteen fifties leads to some grotesque behavior, but as Snow later says,

. . . you can’t feel nauseated by the Whitmans and the Millers without feeling nauseated by the kind of world that’s rewarded them for adapting to it like this.

This is only the beginning of the revelations and understanding that Boy, Snow, and Bird come to over the 15 or so years covered by the novel. The reader becomes enmeshed in this family drama, sharing Boy’s and Bird’s need to know, to understand, to manage. Everyone pays a price when the secrets are revealed.

The complex racial and social themes provide a persuasive background for this deeply felt story of family life. Do you agree? Let us know in the comments.

Have a book you want me to know about? Email me at asbowie@gmail.com. I also blog about metrics at asbowie.blogspot.com.

From the Web