Archives

Books, Food

Brooklyn Bugle Book Review: “Food and the City: New York’s Professional Chefs, Line cooks, Street Vendors, and Purveyors Talk About What They Do and Why They Do It,” an oral history by Ina Yalof

July 8, 2016

Screen Shot 2016-07-08 at 9.43.00 AMby Alexandra Bowie
Food. We’ve got to have it, and in New York City the food we have almost always comes from somewhere else, and frequently someone else prepares it. Who are the people who bring it to us or prepare and serve it? Why do they do what they do? These are some of the questions Ina Yalof sets out to understand in her compelling oral history “Food and the City.” Yalof identifies at least one common trait among the diverse men and women whose stories she relates: they love food and eating.

Yalof’s book maps New York City, from the Fulton Fish Market (now in the Bronx) to Denino’s, a family-owned pizzeria in Staten Island. The food business isn’t all high-end restaurants, though Yalof stops in at some of those. Food trucks and caterers play a role too, and one of Yalof’s most interesting interviews is with five-foot-tall Paulette Johnson, who oversees food service operations for the New York City Department of Correction. (In addition to Rikers Island, she feeds inmates at three borough Houses of Detention and for the DOC staff of 8000.) Delving into some of the byways, Yalof finds people who do jobs we don’t see and perhaps haven’t imagined. Along the way she digresses into some fascinating and frequently moving personal stories.

Yalof begins with a section she calls “Starting from Scratch,” in which she describes entrepreneurs who built a food business from nothing – most are immigrants and none, she says, are business school graduates, or trust fund babies, or had friends in high places. There’s a maker of tortillas, a couple of bakers (including Dominique Anselm, inventor of the cronut) and the Halal Guys, whose popular truck generates block-long lines on 6th Avenue. (They say the longest you’ll wait for your food is 20-30 minutes.) It’s run by a guy with a doctorate in veterinary medicine and an engineer – they have a great story. And so does Sam Solasz, who runs Master Purveyors, a wholesale shop in the Hunts Point Meat Market. He’s a Jew whose family was sent first to a ghetto, where he butchered meat for the Germans, and then to Treblinka. He survived by jumping off the train and running into the woods where he found a partisan group and stayed with them until the Russians came. He stayed with them for a few weeks, then went to a Displaced Persons camp and thence to the US. He was sixteen years old.

Other neighborhoods and cuisines follow – Duck and Other Dynasties (family-owned businesses, from fish companies to Peter Luger’s to Papaya King); Taking the Heat (line cooks); along with sections about chefs, managers and wait staff, members of successful partnerships, and party planners, including a lovely interview with Sylvia Weinstock, of Sylvia Weinstock Cakes. Ms. Weinstock contributes one of the best lines in the book:

[Well-known people] inquire[d] if I would do it for free for the ‘publicity,’ or just for the ‘honor’ (their word, not mine) of making their wedding cake. I always say, ‘Sure, I’ll do it for free. But only if you come down and talk to my seventeen employees and ask them to give up a week’s salary to create your cake. If they agree, you’ve got it for free.’ Nobody ever took me up on it.

Yalof ends her book with a discussion she calls Counter Culture, which includes interviews with a Zabar’s lox slicer, the owner of Murray’s Cheese and Brooklyn Heights’ own Charlie Sahadi. Turns out he doesn’t drink coffee, and likes chocolate and ice cream. We hope your retirement is full of good things, Charlie.

Have a book you want me to know about? Email me at asbowie@gmail.com. Follow me on Twitter @abowie917.

From the Web

Books

Brooklyn Bugle Book Review: “The Summer Guest” A Novel By Alison Anderson

June 24, 2016

Screen Shot 2016-06-22 at 4.58.45 PMby Nidhi Pugalia

Does knowing that art is designed, not divined, make it any less authentic? Inspired by the writer Anton Chekhov’s personal letters, Alison Anderson’s sublime historical novel, The Summer Guest, poses this question as it explores the lives of three women separated by a century yet inextricably bound by their connection to Chekhov.

In the summer of 1888, young Ukranian Zina Lintvaryova, her promising medical career thwarted by an illness that has stolen her sight and spirit, has retired to her family home in rural Luka. When her family rents out a cottage, Zina forms a bond with the tenants’ son: doctor and just-coming-to-fame writer Anton Chekhov. As her condition worsens, Zina chronicles their penetrating conversations in her diary – memorializing a relationship that brought “light and vision” back into her life.

Her words in turn revitalize the lives of two women more than a century later. In the winter of 2014, Zina’s diary finds its way to translator Ana Harding with a request from Russian publisher Katya Kendal to translate it into English. To Ana, Zina’s diary stands out for its earnest narrator and reveals unimaginable possibility: the opportunity to change literary history when she discovers that Chekhov, known for his short works, may have written a novel. Ana turns to Katya with numerous questions about the diary’s discovery and the location of Chekhov’s lost novel.

Katya, faced with the simultaneous collapse of her publishing company and personal life, knows Zina’s diary is her last hope to save both. Yet she evades Ana’s queries, prompting Ana to travel to Luka to find the answers she needs. The novel alternates seamlessly between past and present, uniting across time and place three women who seek meaning in lives fraught with loss. Zina’s ruminations illuminate Ana and Katya’s struggles for independence in a patriarchal world. Anderson creates a poignant feminist narrative peppered with insights that make us pause in thought, as when Zina reflects on Sofia Tolstoy’s traditional role as housewife, offering an alternate perspective. She writes: “Perhaps she reckons his shadow is better than no shadow.

The Summer Guest reads at once as a mystery, a loving sketch of the relationship between artist and muse, a journey to find strength in lives made heavy by fate, and, most importantly, a meditation on the deceitful power of imagination. Saluting Chekhov’s perceptive grasp of human nature, Anderson creates complex female protagonists to take on, as Chekhov states, the true role of artist: to pose questions, not provide their answers. As Katya’s silence drives Ana to unravel the truth behind Luka, Zina, and Chekhov, readers come to understand how cunningly crafted art can be and are asked to ponder whether a story must be true for it to have meaning – or if “the beauty of fiction,” as Ana proffers, is “that it [aims] closer at the bitter heart of truth than a story [told] as it…unfolded” could. For this firm hold on the “heart of truth,” readers must pick up Alison Anderson’s The Summer Guest.

UPDATE: This post has been updated once to remove a repeated sentence.

Nidhi Pugalia is an MFA candidate writing fiction and living in Manhattan. Read her blog, or email her at pugalia.nidhi@gmail.com.

From the Web

Books

Brooklyn Bugle Book Review: “All My Puny Sorrows” A Novel by Miriam Toews

June 10, 2016

by Alexandra Bowie

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.55.35 AMCan one ever escape the past? That’s a question Miriam Toews raises in her sad, funny, and deeply engaging novel “All My Puny Sorrows.” The novel is centered on the close relationship between two sisters, Elfrieda and Yolandi Von Riesen, the first a successful concert pianist and the other a writer. Elfrieda, called Elf, and Yolanda, or Yoli, spring from a Mennonite community in central Canada; they’ve left it behind, as has their mother and her own sister, Tina. The family is spread across Canada, but often fly between Winnipeg, where Elfrieda and their mother live, and Toronto, where Yoli lives with her younger child Nora, to see each other. Her older son, Will, is in college in New York. Yoli, the writer, makes just barely enough to support herself and her children; she is in the process of divorcing Nora’s father. Elf is in the midst of her own attempt to escape, and much of the book takes place in and around the hospitals where her suicide attempts land her.

Sisters, of course, have a shared past, and the two pairs of sisters in this novel had to fight hard to leave their traditional community. In one early scene Yoli describes Elf’s loud and their mother’s quiet but equally effective resistance when the community’s elders, all male, come to their house to tell their father that he must stop his daughter from playing the piano. The community itself has a history of suffering, and reminds its members, and its children, that their grandparents had escaped from discrimination and violence back in Russia. The family does as well: Yoli and Elf’s father died alongside a Canadian railroad track, possibly a suicide, most of his 206 bones broken.

Despite the pain, these are lives lit with wit and humor, and a great deal of love. Yoli, the narrator, recounts incidents and conversations in a dry tone. After an exchange with Elf in which she rebuts Yoli’s claim that apologies “are what keep us civilized” citing the Catholic confession that “allows for entire slates of indiscretion to be wiped clean” and after a few conversational footnotes, Elf says:

I’m just saying that apologies aren’t the bedrock of civilized society. All right! I said. I agree. But what is the bedrock of civilized society? Libraries, said Elf.

There are many dyads here: Elf and Yoli, each daughter with their mother, their mother with her sister Tina, Yoli and Nora. They thrive, mostly, but are realistic. They need each other, as suffering is central to their lives. When Elfrieda attempts suicide Yoli and their mother are sad but not surprised, unhappy but empathetic. Elfrieda begs Yoli to take her to Switzerland, because she thinks its laws may allow Yoli to help Elf in her quest to end her life, and Yoli struggles to reconcile her conflicting impulses to help or hinder her sister.

The novel’s ending is realistic, and many readers will be saddened, and some may be angered, by Toews’ empathic and sympathetic resolution of the sisters’ dilemma. It seems extraordinary that Toews has written a deeply engaging and sympathetic novel about suicide, but that’s what she’s done.

From the Web

Books

Brooklyn Bugle Book Review: “Old Age: A Beginner’s Guide” by Michael Kinsley

May 27, 2016

Screen Shot 2016-05-27 at 10.38.36 AMby Alexandra Bowie

It’s perhaps an odd way to put it, but thought-provoking: old age comes for us all, if we are lucky enough to live that long. Disarming the sore points with humor while engaging in a deeply honest contemplation of the future that awaits us is the modus operandi of Michael Kinsley’s slim volume of essays. Michael Kinsley (b. 1951), one of the Baby Boomers’ most prolific and insightful journalists, was diagnosed with Parkinson’s at the age of 43, so has had an early glimpse into what the degenerative aspects (physical and mental) of aging will be like. In this breezy, mordant collection of essays he gives us a preview.

The front end of the Baby Boom generation, those born between, say, 1945 and 1954, is now slouching in the direction of old age: the oldest boomers have turned 70. In a neat chiasmus, of the markers of success Kinsley identifies (making money, making more money, making more money faster), getting to the finish line of life first is not necessarily the goal. That’s tough to take for a generation raised to succeed. In Kinsley’s description, the Baby Boomers succeeded the greatest generation; succeeded in forcing the US out of Vietnam; succeeded at squandering the resources, financial and environmental, our parents left to us. We’re a bit obnoxious – Kinsley claims that we’re so obnoxious that we scored only two Presidents, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. (Kinsley wrote his essays before the final candidates emerged from this year’s messy nominating process. Both apparent nominees, Hillary Clinton, b. 1947, and Donald Trump, b. 1946, are Boomers. Bernie Sanders, b. 1941, is not.)

A couple of themes emerge. One is, well, the meaning of life. Is it to accomplish something? Most of us, Kinsley points out, even those who wrote a lot or made a lot of money, won’t be remembered, outside our families, for long after our deaths. Accumulate things? Kinsley sums up that option with a discussion of the bumper sticker “He who dies with the most toys, wins.” Live longer? As Kinsley points out, and his experience underlines, there’s a point at which quality of life starts to decline. So what is the meaning? He gets to that, but enjoy the voyage, because Kinsley’s commentary is wildly entertaining, and well-written.

Another theme is coping. Kinsley outlines three strategies–denial, confrontation, or acceptance–for the moment disease comes into one’s life (and it will, is Kinsley’s reminder).

Acceptance is an aspiration, not a strategy. Confrontation means putting the disease at the center of your life. . .Denial, on the other hand, means letting the disease affect your day-to-day life as little as possible. In fact, it means pretending as best you can that you don’t even have it.

To me, confrontation and denial seem like equally valid strategies, and the choice between them is one of personal taste.

Parkinson’s disease itself provides Kinsley with a third theme, others who’ve had it (Michael J. Fox, Pope John Paul II, possibly Hitler), research, particularly the way the second Bush Administration sat on stem cell research, and whether it kills you (many people with Parkinson’s die of something else). His description of what must have been a very frightening surgery, deep brain stimulation (DBS), is quite funny.

I tried to convince myself in the days leading up to the operation that DBS isn’t really brain surgery. They don’t crack open your skill; they just drill a couple of small holes to put the wires through. Tiny holes. Itsy-bitsy holes . . . [the paperwork] describes the holes as ‘dime-sized.’ That took me aback. The dime, there’s no denying, is a seriously undersized coin. But frankly, I hadn’t been thinking of coins at all. I’d been thinking grains of sand. A dime is huge!

There are no answers, though there are some very funny set pieces and some serious observations along the way. Kinsley ends his book with a look to the future: that Boomers, together, set an example and mend our ways. Americans have been unrealistic for quite some time, he notes, in our refusal to pay now for anything. But without money, our government won’t continue functioning, and Kinsley runs through arguments about infrastructure and the estate tax and increasing and inefficient health care spending. Something has to give, and he challenges his generation to suggest a solution.

Have a book you want me to know about? Email me at asbowie@gmail.com. Follow me on Twitter @abowie917.

From the Web

Books

Brooklyn Bugle Book Review: “Ways to Disappear” a novel by Idra Novey

May 13, 2016

Screen Shot 2016-05-13 at 8.01.25 AM

by Alexandra Bowie

Pity Emma Neufeld, the protagonist of Idra Novey’s delightful novel “Ways to Disappear.” Emma is a translator – her specialty is a Brazilian writer Beatriz Yagoda, whose works Emma translates for Elsewhere Press, which Novey describes as “just a woman named Judie in upstate New York and various interns from a small university nearby.” Consider the plight of the translator: she must convey the words of her author but also all their connotations. She’s in the middle: she can read the words in their original Portuguese, and also the ways in which English, even in Emma’s translation, tells both more and less than the original. Beatriz’s work, which Novey outlines, has a strain of magical realism and contains challenging images that leave her many fans debating interpretations. In Novey’s description, Emma remembers “an orange glow over the ocean and use[s] that light to illuminate the strange, dark boats of Beatriz’s images as she ferried them into English.”

Emma lives in Pittsburgh with her dreary boyfriend, Miles, who obsesses about running and his wedding to Emma. Emma visits Beatriz in Rio de Janeiro each year. One day Beatriz climbs a tree and disappears, to escape a gambling debt that takes all around her by surprise. Emma, in wintry Pittsburgh, convinced that Beatriz’ work, which she knows better than anyone, will be the key to tracking her down, heads to warm and sunny Rio to join the search, over the protests of Miles and of Beatriz’s daughter, Raquel.

Emma is both right and wrong, the latter because she’s forgotten the difference between the work and the life. On her arrival in Brazil Emma encounters others who are just as devoted to Beatriz as she is – Raquel and her brother Marcus, the loan shark Flamenguinho, and Beatriz’s first publisher, Roberto Rocha. But when a draft of a new novel turns up in Beatriz’s computer, Emma’s skills are put to use. So are those of Marcus (he has inherited his mother’s seductive green eyes), Roberto (he has money, and a lover he wants to protect), Raquel (secrets of her own), and Flamenguinho (he intends to get his money, or as much of it as possible). Everyone agrees the police will be of no use, and Novey allows several of her characters to come to harm.

The writing is lively, evoking both the light and the danger of Rio de Janeiro and several Brazilian islands. Chapters are short, some just a few lines, and are regularly interspersed with emails from Miles back in Pittsburgh (“Subject: alive?”) as well as what reads like a translator’s dictionary:

(“Transcribe: From the Latin prefix trans + scribere. 1. To write something anew and fully, as with a score of music for a new instrument. 2. To convert a written work in such a way that it alters the expectations of others and/or oneself, often requiring the abandonment of such expectations entirely. See also: transform, transgress, translate.”)

The dictionary entries also serve as commentary, and may or may not be distillations of the thoughts Emma records as she digs deeper into Beatriz’s life.

“Ways to Disappear” is an absorbing, deeply satisfying, and extremely well-written look at the line between art and life. It’s brief – too short for a long plane ride, but perfect for a sick day or convalescent friend.

Have a book you want me to know about? Email me at asbowie@gmail.com. Follow me on Twitter @abowie917

From the Web

Books

Brooklyn Bugle Book Review: “A Mother’s Reckoning: Living in the Aftermath of Tragedy” A Memoir by Sue Klebold

April 29, 2016

by Alexandra Bowie

Screen Shot 2016-04-29 at 10.43.39 AM

Image via Amazon.com

It’s easy to understand why the parent of a murderer may be ostracized by her community. The morning of April 20, 1999 brought horrific news for Sue Klebold, along with many other people that day. As did thirteen other families, she lost a child that day. Unlike all but one of the other families, she lost something else: her younger son, Dylan, was one of the two shooters. (Together, Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris killed 15 people: 12 students, one teacher, and themselves. They caused injuries to 24 more people.) In “A Mother’s Reckoning” Klebold recounts how she moved from shock, to grief, to a guilt she will always feel, and to an acknowledgement that she will also, always, love her son. It’s a gripping piece of work, heartbreaking and frightening because despite the picture the media painted, Dylan showed no signs his parents recognized of his fatal depression and urge to die.

When her husband called to tell her that there had been a shooting at her son’s school Klebold rushed home from work, uncertain of what had happened and worried about her son’s safety. She and her husband were not allowed inside their house. Slowly, it dawned on Klebold that there had been an attack, and that her son was one of the attackers. She wasn’t told he was dead until the end of the day. She does not shy from accepting her son’s blame, but admits that it took her some time. In an early chapter Klebold writes:

Over the course of the afternoon, I had come to understand Dylan was suspected of shooting people, but this fact registered with me only in an abstract way at first. I was convinced Dylan could not have been responsible for taking anyone’s life. I was beginning to accept he had been physically present during the shootings, but Dylan had never hurt anyone or anything in his life, and I knew in my heart he could not have killed anyone. I was wrong, of course . . . In writing this book, I hope to honor the memories of the people my son killed . . . this is the truth: my tears for the victims did eventually come, and they still do. But they did not come that day.

Klebold describes herself and her husband as hands-on parents who kept a close eye on their two boys and “limited the intake of television and sugary cereals.” Dylan was a good kid, who held down a job, did well enough in high school to be admitted to several colleges, and who happily attended his senior prom three days before the shootings. Klebold describes her own slow journey as she came to accept that her son had, along with the murders, committed suicide. Moreover, she says:

Were there signs that I missed that Dylan was going to commit a crime, especially one of such devastating magnitude? No. . . .That doesn’t mean I was powerless, however, because there were signs that year that Dylan was depressed. I now believe that if [Dylan’s father] and I had been equipped then to recognize those signs, and been able to intervene as far as his depression was concerned, we would at least have had fighting chance to prevent what came next.

In the second half of the book, without ever denying Dylan’s culpability or responsibility for the murders he committed before he died, Klebold sets out a nuanced and complex discussion of what’s understood now about suicide and the clues that she now sees – but didn’t when Dylan was alive – that showed her son was depressed. She also describes, briefly, later difficult events: she was diagnosed with breast cancer, her marriage failed, there were lawsuits and death threats. (There are some events, covered by settlements that ended the many lawsuits that followed the Columbine shootings, that Klebold is unable to write about.) The family life Klebold describes is ordinary, and she is careful throughout to acknowledge that there is no hierarchy to suffering. This book is not an attempt to excuse or explain. It’s essentially a work of advocacy, a way of urging more research and suicide prevention outreach and efforts. “A Mother’s Reckoning” is also a description of Klebold’s route back into a community.

“A Mother’s Reckoning” is not an easy book to read – though it is well-written. But it is worth reading, both because Klebold demonstrates that there are no easy ways to explain what happened to her son during what she calls his “brain illness” and because it’s abundantly clear that any number of parents could wind up the parent of a suicide, and some smaller number the parent of a murderer/suicide. As Klebold puts it, loving someone, and telling them so, isn’t good enough to prevent suicide, and many of the parents of suicides she met hadn’t “recognized indicators of potential risk.” Prevention, she tells us, does not require prediction. Instead, she advocates for a tiered risk analysis and response system in schools, along with making access to firearms much harder. It’s a crucial lesson, and the fact that Klebold learned it because of such horrendous circumstances does not render it any the less important.

Have a book you want me to know about? Email me at asbowie@gmail.com. Follow me on Twitter @abowie917.

Note that starting in May and continuing through the summer I’ll be posting every other week.

From the Web

Books

Brooklyn Bugle Book Review: “The Year of the French,” a novel by Thomas Flanagan

April 22, 2016

by Alexandra Bowie

Screen Shot 2016-04-21 at 10.43.02 AMA small country, populated by an uneducated peasantry who make their living as farmers, with a rich oral tradition of stories and poems, whose religious minority governs a religious majority, awakens one day to the presence of troops from another nation that has recently undergone its own revolution. The setting could be any number of countries in the world today, but Thomas Flanagan set his novel “The Year of the French” (available from NYR Books) in the Ireland of 1798. In that year Ireland saw several risings, perhaps inspired by the more successful rebellion of the United States and revolution in France, all of which were defeated by the British, who often used summary proceedings and brutal methods to execute men they regarded as traitors.

To vastly oversimplify a complex and long history, Ireland was governed by Protestants from England, Catholics had very few civil rights, and most of the land was held by landlords, many of whom were absentee and living in England, and worked by tenant farmers, largely Catholic. Much of the land was subject to heavy mortgages, and landowners sometimes found sheep or cows to be more economically appealing than tenant farmers, which led them to drive the farmers and their families off the land, sometimes without any warning. The United Irishmen, the organizing force behind the uprising, attempted to overcome sectarian differences, but the long history of mistrust, as much as the English army’s larger, better-equipped and disciplined army meant the effort was doomed. With these events in the background “The Year of the French” offers a fictional look at their impact in Ireland’s north west counties.

As the novel opens, word of uprisings in Wexford, in the extreme southeast of the country, and unrest in other parts has just reached Mayo, in the far northwest. A group of farmers persuades Owen MacCarthy, a poet and hedge schoolmaster, to write a letter warning the local gentry that removing peasants from the land will be met with resistance. MacCarthy does so, against his better judgment. When three ships arrive in the bay, bringing soldiers and a general from France, a limited but brutal rebellion unfolds. A small contingent of local yeomanry is imprisoned, a few grand homes are pillaged and burned, and several thousand men, armed by the French, leave their harvests and march off to join “The Army of the Gael” they expect is rising in the center of the country.

They do not leave a peaceful county behind. The rebels have managed to persuade the local Sheriff, Dennis Browne, to leave, and establish in his absence a provisional government called the Republic of Connaught. Its president, John Moore, is a member of the Catholic landed gentry, whose father escaped an earlier invasion by decamping to Spain. The elder Moore made a fortune smuggling Spanish brandy into Ireland, and at the end of his life returned with his two sons, George, a historian writing the story of the Girondists, and John. George wants no part of the rebellion; John, who is deeply in love with the daughter of a neighbor, feels he must participate, and he is named President of the Republic of Connaught.

Ably led by the French general, Humbert, the rebels win a skirmish or two, most notably taking the town of Castlebar in southern Mayo, before heading east. More farmers join them, driven perhaps by hope, or maybe attracted to the shift away from their daily labor, or the songs and stories of success that make the rounds of the taverns. As Owen observes at one point, the wheel of fortune “is oiled by whiskey.”

Flanagan tells his story from many points of view, ranging from Owen MacCarthy, the irresolute and regretful poet, to Malcolm Elliott, one of the movers behind the rebellion, who writes as he awaits execution for treason, to Harold Wyndham, a young adjutant to General Cornwallis, reflecting on the events many years later in his own memoirs. Part of Flanagan’s extraordinary achievement in this novel is that he makes the disparate points of view of the main characters sympathetic. (That’s not so of the secondary characters.) John Moore, for example, feels he must follow his heart rather than his head, and act with the rising. His older brother George begs him not to, and then, when John is captured and imprisoned as a traitor, George sets his own scruples and worries aside to bargain with the English in an effort to save John’s life.

The novel includes some wonderful descriptions of the countryside and the wet and changeable weather, as well as vivid depictions of life at the end of the 18th century. One particularly memorable scene describes a landholder, struggling to hold on to his plantation despite mortgages and financial encumbrances, standing on a tower and watching as the Irish army straggles by, under its flag of green silk. As he watches he sees the two sons of one of his tenants run from their field, lean their scythes against the fence, clamber over it, retrieve their scythes and join the scrum. That’s the last he sees of them, though the attentive reader learns their fates.

“The Year of the French” is necessarily lengthy, so that Flanagan can develop the many complexities of his story. The events described in the novel took place at the same time as Napoleon’s incursion into Egypt, events that are never far from the mind of the French general Humbert. The many interlocking storylines and relationships among all the characters, fictive and historical, underline how complex it will be to resolve the history and politics any of the numerous parallel situations while also illustrating just how personal interests can underlie an individual’s political acts.

Have a book you want me to know about? Email me at asbowie@gmail.com. Follow me on Twitter @abowie917.

From the Web

Books

Brooklyn Bugle Book Review: “The Lonely City: Adventures in the Art of Being Alone” by Olivia Laing

April 15, 2016

Screen Shot 2016-04-15 at 5.37.52 PMby Alexandra Bowie

The loss of a love affair, and the subsequent plunge from being one of a pair to living alone, provide the impetus for Olivia Laing’s collection of thought-provoking essays mixed with incisive memoir exploring art, singularity, and New York City. Laing quotes Dennis Wilson’s line “Loneliness is a very special place” as she starts her exploration of what it means to be lonely and, as she puts it, her “attempt to chart the complex relationship between loneliness and art.” Others have written about the feeling of loneliness; Laing, instead, examines her feelings through the visual arts, and the lives of several artists.

Laing begins with Edward Hopper, focusing in particular on his painting “Nighthawks.” Four people, alone and yet together, are seen through a curved glass window. Laing asks, “Was the diner a refuge for the isolated, place of succour, or did it serve to illustrate the disconnection that proliferates in cities? The painting’s brilliance derived from its instability, its refusal to commit.” From there Laing discusses psychologists’ descriptions of loneliness, from temporary to extreme and intractable emotional isolation – and the difficulty the unlonely have in relating to a lonely person’s efforts to reach out for company. We are made uneasy by and blame the lonely for their isolation, she says. Then Laing points out that perhaps we know instinctively what she reports modern research has discovered: “loneliness drives up blood pressure, accelerates aging, weakens the immune system, and acts as a precursor to cognitive decline . . . it can prove fatal.”

After the chapter on Hopper, which spends too much time discrediting his long marriage and ignores his Cape Cod paintings, Laing moves on to the work and lives of Andy Warhol, David Wojnarowicz, the outsider artist Henry Dargis, and then, starting with a discussion of the singer Klaus Nomi, circles back to Wojnarowicz, Warhol, and the impact of the AIDS epidemic on late 20th century New York. The lives were difficult, and Laing’s descriptions are unsparing, especially the chapter on Dargis, a thrown-away human being: both his parents were dead by the time he was eight; he was raised in a the Illinois Asylum for Feeble-Minded Children; he lived alone and worked as a janitor, until, at the age of 80, he became too ill to care for himself and moved to a nursing home. When his Chicago landlord cleaned out the room Dargis had lived in for 40 years, he found more than 300 paintings “of almost supernatural radiance” and 15,000 manuscript pages describing, in Laing’s words, a “coherent otherworld . . . a place Dargis inhabited far more dynamically and passionately than he did the everyday city of Chicago.”

Since Laing is writing a memoir, and mediating the experience of loss and loneliness through art, it makes sense that for her the art and the life are different sides of the same experience. Some of her insights are compelling. For example, in her sympathetic chapter on Warhol, Laing captures what it’s like to participate in a conversation without quite getting the parameters right, something most of us outgrow by the end of high school but an experience Warhol continued to suffer throughout his life (he was the child of immigrants).

Either you don’t communicate enough and remain concealed from other people, or you risk rejection by exposing too much altogether: the minor and major hurts, the tedious obsessions, the abscesses and cataracts of need and shame and longing.

Laing could be describing blog comments, Facebook discussions, or Reddit threads with this passage. It’s a measure of her strengths as a writer that Laing is able to translate Warhol’s experience into a universal one that didn’t become obvious until the advent of the Internet, long after Warhol’s 1987 death.

In describing her experience of loss through her experience and interpretation of the work of others Laing is not unusual. What’s different here is that Laing brings her research about the difficult, painful, and yes, lonely lives of her subjects into a close relationship with their art. This has two consequence for the book: first, it can be very hard to read. Some of these lives were painful – Henry Dargis’’ in particular. Second, she asserts that often the work is an attempt to explore and explain a life, and in one sense it may be, but many writers and painters will argue that while the work bears a relationship to the life the work and the life are distinct. At the same time, it’s too easy for her to succumb to a false sense of nostalgia for a New York that existed before she arrived, when Times Square was messy and dirty and full of pornography. Despite its 8,000,000 residents and countless visitors, New York City is still a lonely place, and still a place of great creative ferment. For the moment, though, it’s not a dangerous one.

Have a book you want me to know about? Email me at asbowie@gmail.com. Follow me on Twitter @abowie917.

From the Web

Books

Brooklyn Bugle Book Review: “The Cabaret of Plants: Forty Thousand Years of Plant Life and the Human Imagination” by Richard Mabey

April 8, 2016

Screen Shot 2016-04-08 at 11.19.18 AM

by  Alexandra Bowie

Plants give humans many things: Oxygen. Shade. Beauty. Food. Scientific insights. Subjects for works of art. Metaphors. It’s tempting to anthropomorphize them, and that’s been our habit for the last several hundred years despite biologists’ division of plants and animals into separate kingdoms. Richard Mabey’s collection of essays provides a wide-ranging historical survey of the relationship of humans and plants as filtered through the human mind. At the same time, he interleaves recent biological developments illustrating how poorly our analogies capture the variety and splendor of plants.

Mr. Mabey’s generous scope allows him to address many forms of human imagination. He begins at the beginning: neolithic cave paintings display many renderings of animals, but comparatively few of plants. It’s not clear why this disparity exists, or even if it just reflects the chance survival of some but not other media, though Mabey proffers his own theory: “Not yet part of early culture and belief systems, kept outside the dark theaters where the human imagination took flight, undomesticated and unrevered, plants were still essentially wild.” It would take another few millennia for depictions of plants to become common. Nonetheless, Mabey posits, from the very beginning, plants:

Were used very freely, . . . as if floral and foliate growth somehow echo the dynamic processes of our imaginations. If animals have chiefly been metaphors and similes for our physical behaviour, plants — rooting, forking, branching, twining, spiralling, leafing, flowering, bearing fruit — have. . . come to be the most natural, effortless representations of our patterns of thought.

In other sections Mr. Mabey describes trees, and our imaginative and spiritual relationship with them. There’s a section he calls “The Victorian Plant Theater” in which he explains how ferns became decorative elements for clothing as well as houses, and the simultaneous development of greenhouses to display floral samples brought back to England by its many explorers. (It’s a nice, and relevant, twist that the rib and fork structure of the Amazon lily, Victoria Amazonia, provided the inspiration for the design of the Crystal Palace.)

Screen Shot 2016-03-23 at 8.13.36 AM

Image via Google Books

There’s also a section he calls “The Shock of the Real” in which Mabey explores the ways in which plants fell out of metaphor, particularly during the Enlightenment. Newton’s apple gives Mabey a chance to explore the history of apple cultivation: bears played a crucial role. A chapter describing the development of our understanding of photosynthesis follows, and then a look at carnivorous plants: their discovery puzzled Romantic thinkers and “unsettle[d] received ideas about the distinctive character of plants and their place in the natural scheme of things. . . “

Throughout, the writing is beautiful and deeply felt. Here’s how Mabey describes the behavior of olive leaves, illustrating why they are so beloved of painters:

Even in a breeze olive trees seem to shimmer in alternations of green and blue and silver, the undersides of the leaves showing matt grey, and the angled, resinous upper surfaces reflecting the sun in flashes of burnished bronze. The leaves themselves are rigidly fixed to the branches, but these are as flexible as willows so that as they move their shadows flicker through the interior of the tree in a show of natural chiaroscuro.

“The Cabaret of Plants” ends with a few short chapters about recent developments in biology, including a description of the ways in which plants communicate: by electrical pulses that attract insects to nectar, by the release of pheromones that warn neighboring plants of attacking insects, followed by the production in the neighbors of bitter tannins that repel insects. Plants also appear to communicate through root systems in “a vast signalling network.” There’s so much we don’t know, but it appears that plants are far from the static, passive, decorative and food objects we make them. They may even outlive us.

Have a book you want me to know about? Email me at asbowie@gmail.com. Follow me on Twitter @abowie917.

From the Web

Books

Brooklyn Bugle Book Review: “A Constellation of Vital Phenomena” A Novel by Anthony Marra

March 25, 2016

Screen Shot 2016-03-25 at 9.01.22 AMA village outside of Grozny, the Chechen capital, a hospital–one of the few buildings still standing in the bombed-out city–and the road between them provide the settings for Anthony Marra’s beautifully written novel “A Constellation of Vital Phenomena,” an exploration of the violence exacted on the people and culture of Chechnya by the First and Second Chechen wars. Akhmed, a villager, awakens one morning to find that the house of his neighbor and friend, the widowed arborist Dokka, has burned to the ground and Dokka has been taken, by the forces of the Russian Federation. Akhmed finds Dokka’s young daughter Havaa in the woods behind the house, and coaxes her into the city of Grozny, where he persuades a doctor, Sonja, to give them refuge.

But Akhmed’s wife is bed-bound, and he must go home each night to tend to her, an 11-kilometer commute that he walks, circuitously so as to avoid checkpoints and land mines. Sonja and Havaa wonder each day whether he will return, Sonja because Akhmed, who is a doctor, has been helping her in the hospital, and Havaa because Akhmed is the last familiar face. Over the course of the novel’s next four days Akhmed returns three times. In his short nights at home he cares for his wife but also discusses events large and small with his friend Khassan. The friendship is critical to both of them. Khassan won’t speak with his own son, Ramzan, who has become an informer. Khassan, who was exiled to Kazakhstan with his parents (and virtually the entire population of Chechnya) as part of Stalin’s punishment of the Chechens for their support of the Nazis, and then returned with their bones, can’t forgive this betrayal.

Sonja is another person who has returned to Chechnya; in her case, it’s from studies in London, where she could have stayed, married, and avoided the tragedy of her country. But her sister, Natasha, was at home, and needed care after her own return from Europe. Natasha was forced into prostitution and became a heroin addict. She recovered enough to work with Sonja, but eventually the unremitting violence of the war, and the shortages of everything from painkillers to bandages, become too much for her. She leaves without a word, and Sonja spends whatever free time she has trying to piece together the hints of Natasha’s fate she finds or imagines.

“Your family isn’t your choice,” Sonja’s father told her once, long ago, “and without wanting to, she kept discovering what he had meant.” What it means to be a family, a tribe, a village, a city, are some of the themes Marra explores in this compelling novel, and one of the lessons he draws is that betrayal comes from the inside. Marra describes the violence circumstances and humans inflict on his characters, and relates a great deal of it, graphically. Each character faces uncertainty and danger daily, and the stress and demoralization their daily humiliations cause provide the story’s swift undercurrent.

At the same time, there’s humor – the dark kind (the last nurses remaining at the hospital, twins, solve every problem by suggesting amputation at the knee) and a sunnier kind that maintains that apothegms of the Koran can be confused with Bee Gees lyrics or that Havaa can grow up to be a sea anemonist. Every character, including the child Havaa, is fully drawn, whole, and distinguishable. “A Constellation of Vital Phenomena” is a wonderful novel that describes a terrible time. It’s not an easy book to read, and it is set in what may appear to westerners to be an obscure corner of the Caucasus. The Caucasus has been fought over for millennia, it’s a border between Muslim and Christian populations, and, because it depends from the Russian landmass between two large bodies of water, it’s an area that’s important to learn more about. “A Constellation of Vital Phenomena” is a good place to start. (If you want to know more of the history and geography, pair it with Neal Ascherson’s “Black Sea.”)

by Alexandra Bowie

Have a book you want me to know about? Email me at asbowie@gmail.com. Follow me on Twitter @abowie917.

From the Web